top of page

No events at the moment

Post: Blog2_Post

Contemporary African photography show celebrates new generation of artists, but misses a trick

Jul 17, 2023
4 min read

Tate Modern show introduces British audiences to a unique African perspective


By Kerstin Hacker - Senior Lecturer, Photography, Anglia Ruskin University (Special to Black Headline News)

A World In Common at Tate Modern. Tate Modern/Lucy Green

The last large survey exhibition of African photography by a major western gallery was In/Sight at the Guggenheim Museum in New York in 1996. Twenty-seven years later, Tate Modern is introducing a British audience to the next generation of African photographers.


With such a long gap, there are high expectations for A World in Common: Contemporary African Photography. And the exhibition faces many curatorial challenges.


For most British visitors, this exhibition serves as an enlightening journey that challenges their perspective. It confronts and dismantles enduring colonial stereotypes associated with Africa. Simultaneously, it stands as a long-awaited affirmation of African photographers, validating their unique use of the medium.


The show’s curator, Osei Bonsu, developed three major themes – “identity and tradition”, “counter histories” and “imagined futures”. The 36 featured photographers tell stories of a new and confident Africa. It’s an Africa that celebrates its spirituality and is untangling itself from its colonial past. This is awe-inspiring work, by a new generation of artists who draw on the rich social and political history of the continent to tell their stories.


When entering the exhibition, I was immediately taken in by a series of large portraits: Nigerian Monarchs by George Osodi. The formality of the images speaks to the importance of these rulers as custodians of cultural heritage – even though their powers were eroded during British colonial rule.


The portrait of Obi Anyasi II, the longest reigning African king, is a clever comment on Nigeria’s past. His stern gaze competes with that of Queen Elizabeth II, whose portrait is printed on his gown. In the exhibition catalogue, Osodi explains that documenting and archiving culture is “key to understanding cultural origins, and thus developing a sense of identity”.


In the same room is Zimbabwean artist Kudzanai Chiurai’s series We Live in Silence. These works are a reminder that Christian missionaries contributed to the colonial occupation of the continent and were instrumental in dismantling pre-colonial societies, in which women had often been powerful and influential figures.

Inspired by Bible scenes, Chiurai’s work focuses on modern African women. He reclaims their space in the historic narrative of the continent.


At the same time, female artists are still struggling to claiming their space in the exhibition as only 12 women featured. Gender balance should have been a fundamental consideration in the curation of this exhibition, as it is crucial to foster equal representation of African women in the arts.


Dialogue and consent

Wura-Natasha Ogunji’s work stood out as the only piece in the show that documented a response from Africans and engaged the African audience directly.


In her performance video, Will I Still Carry Water When I Am a Dead Woman? a group of masked women drag golden water canisters through the busy streets of Lagos, Nigeria. The reactions of the local people underscored art’s potential to challenge the undervaluing of female labor. It provokes dialogue where performance art is not widely understood or appreciated.

Ogunji, born in Nigeria, received her BA from Stanford University and an MFA from San Jose State University in the US. This highlights yet another issue with the roster of photographers in the exhibition. A considerable number have well-established ties with European and American art institutions.


Also, a significant portion have pursued their studies in Europe and the US, are represented by international galleries and maintain a dual presence between two continents. They are part of the global art scene that sees African art as a growing investment opportunity. There’s a risk that will result in the best examples of African art leaving the continent. As French gallery owner Cécile Fakhoury has observed: “If we keep going as we are, in ten or 20 years we will see all the major pieces in foreign countries.”


As this intensifies, it perpetuates a resource vacuum for local artists solely residing and working in Africa. It highlights the continuous underfunding of the cultural sector by most African governments and the lack of globally recognized art institutions on the continent.


Sadly, Tate Modern has missed a trick here. It could have more purposefully supported and celebrated the creation of local African art and included material that challenged its own position (as well as that of other western art institutions) in the global art market. As it is, I am provoked to think that A World in Common is a European exhibition with African content, rather than an exhibition that invites uncomfortable conversations about the function of institutions in the effort to decolonize our understanding of African art.


In the final two rooms, artists are imagining futures for Africa. Kiripi Katembo’s beautiful photographs of Kinshasa reflected in rainwater puddles capture urban life through a surreal mirror. Andrew Esiebo’s large images create a momentary stillness in the ever-changing architecture and landscape of Lagos. They comment on the “endless juxtapositions that exist in the city, between past and present, modernity and tradition”, as Esiebe observes in the catalogue.


What struck me most about the exhibition was the consent implicitly and explicitly expressed in all the works by collaborating with the sitters and avoiding works created through covert observations.


By working with masks, mirrors, self-portraiture or consenting sitters, the featured artists all circumnavigate the historic and often still-present exploitative relationship between the camera and the African continent. This is a decolonial approach to photography we can all learn from, but it also poses the question of how African photographers will make visible the richness of everyday life on the continent.


On the epilogue text panel, Senegalese writer and academic Felwine Sarr calls for “Africans to think and formulate their own future”. The 36 exhibiting artists definitely do that. But the curatorial challenges are manifold. My observations are an attempt to move the conversation beyond the thought-provoking work of the photographers and towards challenging the role of Tate Modern.


A World in Common: Contemporary African Photography is on at the Tate Modern until January 4 2024.

309 Comments


Bài viết có điểm đáng chú ý ở chỗ vừa ghi nhận sức sống của thế hệ nghệ sĩ nhiếp ảnh châu Phi mới, vừa chỉ ra rằng triển lãm vẫn bỏ lỡ một cơ hội nào đó. Tôi thích phần nhận xét không hoàn toàn một chiều, vì nó cho thấy một triển lãm có thể có nhiều tác phẩm đáng xem nhưng vẫn còn hạn chế trong cách kết nối. Đọc đến đoạn nói về việc người xem tìm các thú vui khác sau khi rời phòng trưng bày, tôi liên tưởng đến game bài đổi thưởng và cái tên SUNWIN, chỉ là điều từng nghe qua. Suy nghĩ chính của tôi vẫn là triển lãm cần mở…

Like

andrewwright3295
6 hours ago

Bài viết về triển lãm nhiếp ảnh đương đại châu Phi cho thấy thế hệ nghệ sĩ mới có nhiều điều đáng để chú ý, nhưng tiêu đề cũng báo trước rằng triển lãm còn bỏ lỡ một cơ hội nào đó. Tôi thích kiểu nhận xét không chỉ khen mà còn đặt câu hỏi về cách tác phẩm được giới thiệu. Đang đọc, tôi chợt nhớ từng nghe tên SUNWIN trong một câu chuyện về việc giải trí lúc rảnh, nhưng đó chỉ là liên tưởng thoáng qua, không phải trải nghiệm của tôi. Với bài này, phần khiến tôi suy nghĩ lâu hơn là khoảng cách giữa chất lượng của nghệ sĩ và cách một triển lãm tạo bối…

Like

quinn14988
22 hours ago

Điểm “misses a trick” trong tiêu đề làm tôi chú ý: một triển lãm có thể tôn vinh thế hệ nghệ sĩ mới nhưng vẫn bỏ lỡ điều gì đó trong cách giới thiệu họ. Tôi chưa đọc đủ nội dung để biết bài nói cụ thể về khoảng trống nào, nên cũng chưa muốn đoán. Lúc nghỉ giữa những bài đọc về nghệ thuật, đôi khi tôi nghĩ đến game bài đổi thưởng như một chủ đề giải trí khác; cái tên nha cai uy tin xuất hiện trong mạch liên tưởng ấy, nhưng tôi không biết gì về dịch vụ mang tên đó. Dù vậy, câu hỏi về điều triển lãm còn thiếu vẫn là phần khiến tôi tò…

Like

Cách bài viết nhìn nhận triển lãm ảnh châu Phi khá thú vị: vừa ghi nhận sự xuất hiện của thế hệ nghệ sĩ mới, vừa cho rằng triển lãm còn bỏ lỡ một cơ hội nào đó. Tôi chưa xem các tác phẩm nên chỉ có thể dựa vào nhận xét trong bài, nhưng chính ý “misses a trick” khiến tôi muốn hiểu rõ hơn điều gì còn thiếu. Khi đầu óc chuyển sang chuyện giải trí ngoài giờ, tôi nhớ tên SUN WIN từng được nhắc như một phần của lĩnh vực game bài đổi thưởng; tôi không biết thêm chi tiết. Dù vậy, câu hỏi về cách triển lãm kể câu chuyện của các nghệ sĩ vẫn là…

Like

I keep coming back to the everyday side of enjoying cycling at a manageable pace, where a simple detail can lead to a wider question. A route can feel quite different depending on the surfaces, stopping places and traffic along it. For Boudiccasportive, I would use cycling route planning as a starting point for a closer discussion of the subject. I would be interested in an example that shows how the idea works in an ordinary situation. Which details would you check before choosing a route for a new rider?

Like
bottom of page